India: Maharashtra plastic ban comes into force

Monday, June 25, 2018

On Saturday, the plastic ban in the Indian state of Maharashtra came into force. In an attempt to minimise pollution, the state government has introduced a ban on single-use plastics.

The leader of the Yuya Sena political party, Aaditya Thackeray, said on Twitter, “The ban on single use disposable plastic cups, plastic bags, plastic straws, plastic plates and cutlery, styrofoam cutlery and non woven bags”. He added, “these are global issues now and we have taken a step to combat it”.

Plastic pollution has led to the choking of drains, marine pollution and a risk of animals consuming plastics. This year, India’s motto for World Environment Day — June 5 — was “Beat Plastic Pollution”. People violating the plastic ban are to face a fine of 5,000 Indian Rupees (INR) for the first offence. For the second offence, the fine is INR 10,000 and the third time offence is INR 25,000 and a three-month prison term. Deputy municipal commissioner Nidhi Choudhary said, “To weed out corruption, we plan to give inspectors payment gadgets for electronic receipts of the fines”.

The Maharashtra government has given a 90-day period for manufacturers to dispose of existing polyethylene terephthalate (PET/PETE) plastic spoons and plates, while shopkeepers and citizens in general have six months to dispose of plastics. However, the ban does not prohibit plastic usage for wrapping medicines or milk cartons thicker than 50 microns.

The state government had announced the decision for the plastic ban on March 23. According to NDTV’s report, Maharashtra is the eighteenth Indian state to enforce a state-wide plastic ban. Aaditya Thackeray also said, “I congratulate the citizens for making this into a movement, even before the ban was enforceable, giving up single use disposable plastic.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=India:_Maharashtra_plastic_ban_comes_into_force&oldid=4417631”

Hilary Mantel’s “Wolf Hall” wins Man Booker Prize 2009

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

The 2009 Man Booker Prize has been awarded to British author Hilary Mantel for her historical novel Wolf Hall. 57 other authors were short-listed, including former winners AS Byatt and JM Coetzee, as well as Sarah Waters, whose book, The Little Stranger, has sold more copies than Wolf Hall.

I can tell you at this moment I am happily flying through the air.

The winning novel tells the tale of Thomas Cromwell, chief minister to Tudor king Henry VIII. In her acceptance speech, Mantel said “I can tell you at this moment I am happily flying through the air.”

Mantel was made a Commander of the British Empire (CBE) in 2006, 21 years after her first novel, Every Day is Mother’s Day, was published in 1985. Wolf Hall was the longest book on the list.

The decision was not unanimous, but all 5 judges were happy to award Mantel the trophy £50,000 prize at the London Guildhall. The judges assert that, despite differing opinions, the decision was not a compromise. James Naughtie said, “When we gathered this morning none of us knew which book was going to win. I think we all felt exhausted at the end of the process but there was real feeling that we had found a book that was worthy of the prize.”

The judges this year were Lucasta Miller, a biographer and critic; Professor John Mullan; James Naughtie, the chairman of judges; Sue Perkins, a comedian, journalist, and broadcaster; and Michael Prodger, the literary editor of The Sunday Telegraph;.

According to Ladbrokes bookmakers, the novel was the clear favourite, with 80% of people betting on it. Some thought this backing would go against the book, since the last time the bookmakers’ favourite won was in 2002, when the prize was given to Yann Martel‘s The Life of Pi.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Hilary_Mantel%27s_%22Wolf_Hall%22_wins_Man_Booker_Prize_2009&oldid=938001”

When The Mary Rose Sank Historic Tudor Picture Of The Battle Of The Solent

By Leon Reis

ORIGINAL TITLE:

The Encampment of the English Forces Near Portsmouth, Together With a View of the English and French Fleets at the Commencement of the Action Between Them on the XIXth of July MDXLV (19th of July 1545)

OTHER NAMES:

The Cowdry Picture

The Cowdry Print

The Last Moments of the Mary Rose

This historic picture was originally painted in 1545 or just afterwards from eye-witness accounts and was destroyed by fire in 1793. It shows the last man standing on the crow’s nest of the great Tudor warship Mary Rose the rest of the ship has disappeared as she sinks below the waves of the Solent.

This article describes the importance of the picture and the story of its preservation and re-publication by modern fine art printing technology. In a sense, the story of the picture modestly echoes the story of the modern technology that helped find, recapture and ultimately preserve the Mary Rose warship herself.

The picture measures almost two metres across and a near-full-size reproduction hangs prominently in the Mary Rose Museum at Portsmouth Historic Dockyard to illustrate the context of the Battle of the Solent, the forgotten action in which Mary Rose went down. Sales of the same reproduction print help to raise funds for a new Mary Rose Museum building in which to reunite the inspiring remains of the resurrected warship with the thousands of her crews Tudor items recovered from the wreck site, from coins and cannon to English longbows.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXdouj93WNk[/youtube]

The warships English flag is shown still flying as she slides to her death, surrounded by bodies in the centre of the picture, just above Southsea Castle.

The dispositions of the fleets for the sea battle, and of the English army preparing to defend Southsea and the approaches to Portsmouth, are on show here. The boats are correctly shown in the deep-water channels of the Solent. Historians say that everybody important who attended the event is in the picture, and it has been proven to be geographically accurate. No wonder that asking a question about the picture is all you need to get senior museum personnel talking at length on the fateful events of that day.

On the morning of July 19, 1545, simply the biggest invasion fleet ever to reach British shores had sailed around the eastern side of the Isle of Wight, landed troops and burned villages near Bembridge, and massed in the Solent with the intention of capturing the town and naval base of Portsmouth. It is thought up to 40,000 French invasion troops were on board.

The mighty French fleet, augmented by gun galleys on loan from the Vatican, had been sent to teach King Henry VIII’s newly Protestant England a lesson and quash Henry’s claim to the throne of France once and for all. Henry had previously been protected from the French by his alliance with Spain, friends he lost when he divorced his first wife, the Spanish Catherine of Aragon.

A year earlier, in 1544, Henry had invaded France and laid siege to Boulogne another battle recorded in a matching great panoramic picture (by a different original artist) now also available as a modern reproduction helping the Mary Rose new museum building fund. Also in 1544, Henry commissioned the building of Southsea Castle to protect the sea lanes into Portsmouth Harbour shown in this picture newly opened, just in time to fire on the French invaders.

The invasion fleet was twice as big as the much more famous Spanish Armada defeated by Francis Drake in later Elizabethan times. As the English fleet sailed out to engage the French off Southsea Castle, led by flagships The Great Harry and The Mary Rose, the Battle of the Solent had begun.

Today, the Battle of the Solent is largely forgotten as an inconclusive military stand-off in largely becalmed waters. In practice the English won by virtue of the French being unable to break through to Portsmouth.

But the events which would otherwise remain as just a historical footnote are alive in the memory because of the famous sinking of the Mary Rose, her dramatic rediscovery (in exactly the position where she is shown sinking in the picture) and then her ultimate resurrection in 1982 in front of a worldwide TV audience of tens of millions of people.

The original picture (artist unknown) of c.1545 is a brilliant piece of art. The characters are all full of life and style, drawn with immense detail and character.

Satellite mapping today of the coast of the Isle of Wight matches the coast painted here, even though the pictures aerial view could never have been seen by the artist as there is no hill from which that view can be seen and obviously there were no aircraft of any sort in 1545. Old maps and plans of the town of Portsmouth show the precision of the layout of key buildings in the picture.

The underwater photographer on the project to find and raise the Mary Rose which culminated in her salvage in 1982 was Dr. Dominic Fontana, now Senior Lecturer in Geography at the University of Portsmouth, who has much more about the picture and its accurate geography on his site.

The original picture was commissioned by the Master of the Kings Horse, Sir Anthony Browne, seen on the white horse in the dead centre of the picture, directly behind the King (a spectacular piece of political self-aggrandisement available to Browne as the client paying the artist! the Commander-in-Chief of the army, Sir Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk, is painted riding alongside Browne, largely obscured but for his mighty beard). Browne had earlier commissioned the panoramic picture of The Siege of Boulogne, in a much simpler, cartoonistic style than that of the artist responsible for this work. Perhaps he learned from the first work that he needed an artist with more sophisticated skills.

These two pictures plus two others depicting the 1544 campaign in France and one from 1547 hung in the dining hall of Browne’s home, Cowdry House (a.k.a. Cowdry Castle) in Sussex, which became the seat of the Viscounts Montague when Brownes family was ennobled. The other pictures of the 1544 campaign in France were The Departure from Calais” and “The Camping of The King at Marquison.

A fire destroyed Cowdry House in 1793 and all the historic original pictures went up in smoke. Today the old walls of the Cowdry House ruins still rise to a great height near the international polo fields of what is now called Cowdray Park at Midhurst in West Sussex. After 200 years mouldering away, the ruins were restored and opened again in early 2007.

So how can we have reproductions of the destroyed Battle of the Solent picture? Just five years before the fire, by a stroke of great good luck and brilliant timing, the Society of Antiquaries of London had copied both pictures to preserve as important historical records. In 1788 Browne allowed the society to commission Samuel Hieronymus Grimm to make painstaking copies by hand in obviously masterly fashion. While doing so, Grimm painted his own watercolour and ink pictures of Cowdry House itself. The society then employed a fine engraver, James Basire, to make plates from Grimms copies; black-and-white prints were then published for the enlightenment of historians and military scholars.

The 1788 prints were very large for prints at that time 1,775mm (nearly 6ft.) wide, by 545mm (nearly 22 inches) high. The engravings had to be printed in two halves on pairs of sheets of paper that were then joined, as 18th Century paper-making technology did not reach to sheets of even 3ft. wide.

Sometime over the centuries from 1788 another artist hand-coloured one of the 1788 prints. This was used to make a reproduction Battle of the Solent 1788 print which in 2007 went on sale on the Internet to support the Mary Rose Museum. So the best available 21st Century high-resolution scanning and computerised fine-art printing technologies have now been employed to capture and faithfully reproduce the fine details of a hand-coloured Basire engraving from Grimms 1788 hand copy after the 1545 original painting.

The stylishly coloured reproduction looks best on canvas, which lends a suitably old feel to the picture, but is also available on archival paper. Both are printed with UV-resistant, archival pigment inks, in a seven-colour gicle printing process. Surprisingly, the richly detailed old picture looks impressive on the sparse walls of minimalist modern homes.

DONATIONS TO The Mary Rose MUSEUM FUND

The Mary Rose was the pride of the Tudor Navy built by Henry VIII the father of the English navy. After she sank in the Battle of the Solent, she lay on the sea bed off Southsea Castle for 437 years until she became an international icon again when she dramatically rose to the surface again in 1982.

Since then she has been intensively treated and has now been restored from the destructive effects of soaking in sea water for four centuries.

Now a new museum building is needed to reunite the great ship currently inspiringly displayed in an ancient dry dock under a huge hut in Portsmouth Historic Dockyard, southern England with the artefacts found alongside her in the mud of the Solent sea bed.

But Britain’s Heritage Lottery Fund the relevant funding authority has so far refused to contribute the necessary 13.5m towards the new museum building, which remains in doubt, casting doubt on the future of the ancient warship herself.

To help raise funds towards the 23m. total required, the publishers of the print request interested people to make voluntary donations. They themselves promise 20% of the online price of the Battle of the Solent art print (and an associated spoof Tudor Football reproduction poster) will go to the fund.

Incidentally, there is a free download available of wallpaper for your PC carrying the spoof Tudor Football reproduction poster). When downloading your free computer wallpaper you also have the opportunity to make a voluntary donation to the museum fund online … you will be helping preserve unique British heritage for your children.

About the Author: Leon Reis is the Director of Artists Harbour (

artistsharbour.com/

).

We provide sales, marketing and production services to artists from our maritime art gallery in a historic Royal Navy gun store 100 metres from Tudor warship Mary Rose and Nelsons Trafalgar flagship, HMS

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=156060&ca=Arts+and+Crafts

‘Afghanistan is a 20-year venture’ warns Canadian general

Monday, August 8, 2005

Maj.-Gen. Andrew Leslie, one of Canada’s top generals says Canadians should prepare for a long mission to Afghanistan in order to help it break out of “a cycle of warlords and tribalism.” Leslie told the audience attending the 74th Annual Couchiching Summer Conference in Orillia, Ontario, Canada on The Use of Force Within and Between Nations that Canada’s troops will have casualties. As many as 1,250 Canadian soldiers will be serving in Afghanistan by February 2006. A 250-strong provincial reconstruction team mission is currently gathering to stabilise the Kandahar region joining the nearly 700 troops already serving in Kabul. “Every time you kill an angry young man overseas, you’re creating 15 more who will come after you”, he said.

“There are things worth fighting for. There are things worth dying for. There are things worth killing for”, Leslie told the conference and he said the end result would be worth the cost:

Patterns of behaviour and beliefs about sovereignty, economics, national interests, national values, social development, the willingness to help others, a drive towards democratic institutions and representational government, the rule of law, quality of life, human rights and national culture are all parts of the larger equation of security requirements and potential solutions.
Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=%27Afghanistan_is_a_20-year_venture%27_warns_Canadian_general&oldid=1093900”

New Zealand prisoners do nothing says National party

Sunday, November 5, 2006

Figures released by Simon Power, law and order spokesman for the National party, show that the New Zealand Labour led government lets 81% of all prisoners not do any work while in prison. Newspaper, Sunday News says that some Christchurch prisoners have been given a barbecue for good behavior.

Simon Power’s figures show that of the 7,612 prisoners only 19% (1,470) of them took part in Corrections Inmate Employment during 2006. But in 2005 it was at 23% and in 2004 it was at 26%. He says that the prisons with the least amount of inmates working are: Rolleston with 8.6%, Mount Eden with 8.7%, Rimutaka with 11%, Christchurch Women’s with 13.5% and Dunedin with 13.8%. Mr Power said: “These figures are an appalling indictment on this Government’s approach to prisoner rehabilitation and preparing them for release.”

“In May, Corrections Minister Damien O’Connor announced a strategy that he said would help in ‘significantly increasing the number of prisoners in work and training. But a week later this was shown to be nothing more than window dressing when the Budget increased funding for prisoner employment by a measly $336,000 – up 1%.”

“They have cut funding [on the Corrections Department] by 27% since 2001/02, from $46.5 million to $34 million.”

Mr Power blames the low work rate on the big prison construction budget of $490 million. “There would have been more than a miserable $336,000 extra to spend on effective rehabilitation and work schemes,” he said.

“[Mr O’Conner] seems happier to spend $11 million on landscaping four new prisons and allow prisoners to sit around playing Playstations and Xboxes on their flat-screen TVs than he is about helping them get better prepared for when they are released.”

“Prisoners should be doing meaningful work, training or study while they are in prisons, and I imagine the public would agree,” Mr Power added.

Mr Power, commenting on the barbecue, said: “These people are in prison because they were found to be in serious breach of the law. The victims of their crimes will be grossly offended by the idea that they are being rewarded for anything. This is the just the latest in a long line of incredibly bad decisions made by the Corrections Department over the past year and taxpayers have had enough.”

Bevan Hanlon, president for the Corrections Officers Association, said: “The Mobsters getting a BBQ was a “joke”. (Christchurch Prison) staff are reporting the smell of dope every day. Mobsters are threatening staff on a daily basis and there appears to be high cellphone use (mobile phones are banned in jail). So what happens? They are given a BBQ.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=New_Zealand_prisoners_do_nothing_says_National_party&oldid=438705”

The Difference Between Sde And Ebitda}

The Difference Between SDE and EBITDA

by

Michael Fekkes

The 3 most commonly used valuation methods are the Income, Market, & Asset approach. With the income approach, a business value is based upon the earnings the enterprise generates. Buyers are most concerned with the amount of earnings that the company produces should they acquire the business. The net ordinary income, utilized for tax reporting purposes, does not properly reflect the true earnings of the company based on the non-cash, discretionary & non-recurring items that are expensed by the business owner. Earnings are kept low to achieve the goal of reducing taxes. Therefore, to calculate the true earning capacity of the company, the P&L statements need to be adjusted during a valuation to determine SDE or EBITDA. Re-casting the financial statements will standardize (or normalize) the company earnings through the exclusion of discretionary, variable and non-recurring components, allowing an objective comparison to be made between two or more companies. By applying a multiple to the EBITDA or SDE amount, consistent with the industry sector and a weighting of the issues affecting the business, will derive the business value.

What is Sellers Discretionary Earnings (SDE)?

Sellers Discretionary Earnings is utilized for businesses with under $1mm in adjusted earnings. These businesses often have the owner managing the company and receiving a salary. With these small enterprises it is critical to determine what the owner benefit is as opposed to the earnings of the company. This is accomplished through a series of profit and loss statement adjustments termed add-backs that are made to the pre-tax company earnings. In some instances, there are negative add-backs as in the case with a business that owns real property (e.g. the building & land) where the owner is compensating himself a below market rent or a family employee working for the company who is receiving a below market salary. In both of these cases, an adjustment is made to normalize the expense to the current market value.

The most common adjustments used during the re-casting process are:

1. Add-back one owner’s total compensation

a. Salary

b. Payroll Taxes

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz5YRqjjNrU[/youtube]

c. Retirement Contributions e.g. 401K

d. Insurance

e. Perks (Health Club, etc)

2. Add-back interest expense

3. Add-back discretionary expenses

a. Donations

b. Personal Cell Phones

c. Travel, Meals, & Entertainment

d. Owners Vehicles (not used in business)

4. Add-back non-cash expenses

a. Depreciation

b. Amortization

5. Add-back Non-recurring expenses

a. Fines / Bank Penalties

b. Attorney fees (e.g. sale of business consultation)

6. Adjust Lease to Fair Market Value

What is Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation Amortization (EBITDA)?

EBITDA is used to define the earnings of the company for businesses with adjusted income greater than $1mm. Here, the owner/investor is typically not active in the direction or daily management of the business and will hire a general manager to perform that function. Therefore, the EBITDA calculation will differ from SDE as it incorporates the general managers salary in the earnings calculation as an expense. EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that is used to determine profitability and to make comparisons between companies and industries as it eliminates the impact of the financing and accounting decisions made. An easy way to determine EBITDA is to subtract the owners compensation and benefits from SDE. The EBITDA dollar amount will be lower than SDE but the multiple used in the valuation formula will be higher, often 2-2.5 times the SDE multiple. Therefore, as one would anticipate the FMV of the same business calculated using either method should be very close to each other. If not, an assessment as to why and which (or what other method(s)) must be undertaken.

Michael Fekkes is a Senior Broker at ENLIGN Business Brokers. Michael is a Certified Business Intermediary (CBI), a member of the International Business Brokers Association (IBBA), as well as a former business owner. ENLIGN Business Brokers http://www.enlign.com/ is a Professional Services Firm that is headquartered in Raleigh, NC providing confidential business intermediary services to buyers and sellers throughout the Southeast region.

Article Source:

The Difference Between SDE and EBITDA}

Neanderthals ‘knew what they were doing’: Archæologist Dr Naomi Martisius discusses her findings about Neanderthals’ behaviour with Wikinews

Sunday, June 28, 2020

Last month, a study conducted by archæologist Dr. Naomi Martisius and other researchers concluded Neanderthals living in Europe tens of thousands of years ago were more sophisticated than previously thought. The now-extinct species used to carefully select bones from a particular animal species to manufacture their bone tools, the research showed. The research was published on May 8 in Nature’s Scientific Reports journal.

Dr Martisius and her team used five bone tools discovered from Neanderthals’ sites in southwest France for this research. Four of these bone tools were found in a site called Abri Peyrony and the other one was from Pech-de-l’Azé I. These tools were just a few centimetres in size and were about 50 thousand years old, Dr Martisius told Wikinews. Microscopy analysis of these bone tools called lissoirs (smoothers) suggested Neanderthals used these tools for working animal skin to leathers.

The study stated the fauna of the sites were primarily medium-sized ungulates such as reindeer, in one layer nearly 90%. Despite the overabundance of medium-sized ungulates, Neanderthals used ribs of large bovids for making lissoirs. Dr Martisius told Wikinews this was likely due to the physical characteristics of the bovid ribs, which were “thicker” and “stronger” as compared to the “thin and flimsy ribs” of reindeers. In order to check the origins of the bone tools, the researchers used a technology called non-destructive Zooarchæology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS).

Instead of damaging the bone artefacts in order to discover its origins, the researchers collected collagen from the plastic containers in which these artefacts were kept. Collagen is a type of protein. These bone artefacts were kept in plastic containers: some were kept for about five years, some for just a few months. During this time, the collagen proteins from bone tools were stuck to the walls of its plastic containers. The collagen samples collected from the walls of the containers are broken into smaller molecules called peptides by using a chemical enzyme called trypsin.

After the trypsin has broken collagen fibres into peptides, it is analysed using a technology called Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) Time-of-Flight mass spectrometer (ToF MS). The assisting matrix is a coloured compound. The acidic peptide is combined with the matrix, vapourised, and peptides are released. Some of them are positively-charged particles which travel across a vacuum tube in an electric field. Depending on the weight of the peptides, these molecules reach the end of the vacuum tube at different instances of time, forming a spectrum. These graphs are like unique fingerprints of a species: they are different for different species of animals. Looking at the database of such graphs, taxonomic identifications of the collagen proteins came be made.

All four bone tools from Abri Peyrony gave positive results and showed that the bones were made from large bovids, even though reindeer were more abundant during that time. One of the advantages of using bovid ribs over reindeer’s thin ribs was the bovid ribs would be more resistant to breaking during flexion, Dr Martisius said.

Dr Martisius said such non-destructive ZooMS analysis was previously conducted, but for tools no older than a few centuries. She said such an analysis had never been previously conducted for artefacts so ancient.

Wikinews caught up with Dr Martisius to discuss this research in-depth.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Neanderthals_%27knew_what_they_were_doing%27:_Archæologist_Dr_Naomi_Martisius_discusses_her_findings_about_Neanderthals%27_behaviour_with_Wikinews&oldid=4623604”

Second Darwin’s sandwich shop opens in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Thursday, June 2, 2005

Darwin’s Ltd. opened a second location of their sandwich shop at 1613 Cambridge Street in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in late May. It is situated across from Cambridge Rindge and Latin School. Previously limited to one location at 148 Mount Auburn Street, the second store seats approximately 30 people and sells sandwiches, coffee drinks, locally made pastries, as well as some produce and snack foods. The establishment also provides free wireless access through the WanderingWifi service. The shop plays music during the day; during this reporter’s visit to the shop, selections played ranged from David Bowie to The Strokes. The store is air-conditioned.

Key differences between the original store and the new one include the unification of the cafe and the sandwich line now behind one counter, handicap accessible restrooms, no beer or wine sold at location, and a lack of a loyal customer base. Although the recent months have been slow, business is expected to pick up with the return of Cambridge area students this autumn.

While the original location of Darwin’s was recently cited for lacking sneeze guards before the kitchen counter, according to the Cambridge Chronicle, the new Darwin’s has acrylic sheets along the front of their sandwich counter. The original Darwin’s has installed the sneeze guard at the kitchen counter the day following citation.

This article features first-hand journalism by Wikinews members. See the collaboration page for more details.
This article features first-hand journalism by Wikinews members. See the collaboration page for more details.
Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Darwin%27s_sandwich_shop_opens_in_Cambridge,_Massachusetts,_USA&oldid=723869”

Former WorldCom chief found guilty of all charges

Tuesday, March 15, 2005A federal jury found Bernard Ebbers guilty on all nine counts in an indictment for fraud, conspiracy and false regulatory filings. The verdict was handed down by a New York jury after 8 days of deliberation on the former WorldCom CEO and mastermind behind the accounting scandal that brought down the telcom giant.

AP writer Erin McClam reported that when the verdict was announced, “Ebbers’ face reddened.”

Sentencing is set for the second Tuesday of next week when he could receive 85 years in prison for the conviction.

Ebbers who took the stand in his own defence, said he left the details of the company’s accounting to others and that he had no knowledge of shady practices. But Scott Sullivan, the ex-chief financial officer of the company and key prosecution witness, directly linked Ebbers to the fraud. Sullivan agreed to co-operate with prosecutors in the hopes of receiving a lenient sentence for his own involvement in the scandal.

The fall of WordCom sparked a massive class action law suit by investors. The plunge in WorldCom’s stock changed the capitalized value of the company in the range of $11 billion as the scandal unravelled. Secuities fraud cases stemming from the suits will probably break new legal ground where the involvement of investment banks and public accounting firms who would normally check company irregularities will be called into legal question.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Former_WorldCom_chief_found_guilty_of_all_charges&oldid=435269”

Searching For Chandler Real Estate? How About Queen Creek Homes?

Submitted by: Reed Lattin

If you want to buy Chandler real estate, or are looking for the best home for you and your family, you need to know where to look. There are many ways to save money on Chandler real estate and Queen Creek real estate with the state of the current real estate market, the number of homes for sale Queen Creek, and the affordability of Queen Creek homes. You need to first determine which location interests you most, and then narrow down your options based on prices and which homes offer what you need. You can save a lot of money on Chandler real estate by buying a home in a slow market, because sellers are desperate to sell and banks are unloading foreclosed properties for dirt cheap prices. As long as you take the time to research and learn about Chandler real estate, your experience buying it, Queen Creek real estate, and homes for sale Queen Creek can be a simple, affordable process.

Queen Creek homes and Chandler real estate are both great investments. You can find homes of every size, shape, and style here, no matter what you re looking for. If you want new construction, Chandler real estate has it. If you prefer older houses with more charm, Chandler real estate and Queen Creek real estate have those options, as well. If you re interested more in homes for sale Queen Creek, all you have to do is specify that to your realtor or in your online search, allowing you to find the home of your dreams no matter what you want. Queen Creek homes and Chandler real estate both have plenty to offer, and living in Arizona is a great option for you and your family.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdVkmxfcs1E[/youtube]

Arizona is a great place to call home for many reasons. It doesn t matter if you re looking to relocate to a warmer climate, or if you just want to find Queen Creek real estate or Chandler real estate so that you can move within your current area, there s something for everyone. The weather is beautiful year round, and the dry, arid climate of the desert offers a great place for chronic allergy sufferers. Queen Creek homes and homes for sale Queen Creek will cost around the same as Chandler real estate, depending on what exactly you re looking for. There is a price range for everyone, but affordability in a buyer s market is never a problem when it comes to Chandler real estate.

Many people are skeptical of buying a home in an economic recession, but as long as you take the time to do the research and know what you re getting into, Chandler real estate and Queen Creek real estate can be a great purchase at any time of year. Sellers are dying to sell their Queen Creek homes and Chandler real estate, which allows you to find homes for sale Queen Creek and Chandler real estate at prices that you might not have thought possible. So many people have already lost their homes, as well, which leaves room in Chandler real estate for you to purchase foreclosures from banks and lenders at less than half of the home s actual value, as long as you know how to work such a deal. Being an informed consumer is the key to your success in Chandler real estate.

About the Author: Reed Lattin is a new homes specialist in Phoenix, AZ and the owner of

savebigonnewhomes.com

Check out Arizona’s most powerful and free new homes search which will save you huge money and time. We save our clients over $27,000 and our service is free. We are members of the BBB 480-227-5214

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=331298&ca=Real+Estate